Posts Tagged ‘Michael Caine’

The Trip

July 15, 2011

Each of director Michael Winterbottom’s films seems exhilaratingly or maddeningly like a departure from the last. His new mockumentary, a BBC TV series here condensed into a movie, follows a friendly but antagonistic pair of self-centered comedians on a week-long road trip through England’s Lake District. Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon play pitiless exaggerations of themselves, touring tony restaurants so Coogan can write a Sunday newspaper article. Really it’s so he and Brydon can bore and annoy and enjoy each other, riffing up a willfully meandering comedic jam session whose highlight has to be the dueling Michael Caine impressions. Other impressions vary, as impressions do (accent-wise, Brydon’s Woody Allen seems much more on target than his Al Pacino, weirdly), and the general question of just where the tedious-hilarious threshold lies will be a rich vein of post-viewing debate, but all parties probably will agree it does get crossed.

Harry Brown

June 10, 2010

Maybe you were expecting a review of The A-Team. It’s reasonable, on account of that film having been made by Joe Carnahan — who, not incidentally, once left this reviewer a huffy voicemail, demanding, “Man up!”

Well, just because The A-Team didn’t screen in time for our deadline doesn’t mean all hope is lost for wallowing in nostalgia and hidebound macho posturing. It is with Carnahan’s injunction especially in mind that I have forgone Waking Sleeping Beauty, the documentary about cartoon Hollywood musicals — indeed, that might seem too much like manning down — and turned my attention instead to Michael Caine’s new geezer-vigilante flick, Harry Brown.

With a movie like this, formula itself is posited as a threatened pillar of the social order. To paraphrase a more famous vigilante named Harry, you’ve gotta ask yourself three questions. When does it get ridiculous? How ridiculous does it get? How satisfying is it in spite of itself? For the record: Not for a while; quite; not very, but better than your bleeding heart wants to admit. The rest is atmosphere, in which director Daniel Barber luxuriates quite adeptly, and star charisma, for which Michael Caine was invented.

Harry wakes at 6:30 a.m. to the clock-radio news of a brutal and senseless nearby homicide (we glimpsed it just prior to the opening credits); flips over in his lonely, too-big bed; scans photos of absent loved ones; takes an inhaler drag to stay the emphysema; and tucks himself with toast and coffee into the usual kitchen corner of his dreary English sink-estate life.

En route then to visit his dying wife in the hospital, Harry hesitates at the obvious shortcut of a pedestrian-highway underpass. Cowed, he takes the long way. Later he’ll push a few chess pieces around at the pub with his oldest pal (David Bradley), while two blasted young scuzzers carry off a drug deal right in front them. And finally, before bedtime, he’ll have one last peek out the window at that ominous underpass. Yes, it all comes back to the foul, gaping mouth of that tunnel, from which thugs now seem to spill out like meth-wrecked teeth.

So that’s the long and the short of Harry Brown’s day. Then the wife succumbs, the scuzzer thugs off his oldest pal, Harry goes gun shopping and payback ensues. All of which is happily revealed by the movie’s official trailer — except the part about Harry’s wife, that is, because the movie itself doesn’t much bother to reveal her either. Apparently, in screenwriter Gary Young’s estimation, it only needed her in order to comply with the formula mandate of our geezer vigilante being an ailing war-veteran widower (see also Death Wish, Gran Torino, etc.). The best thing Harry can say about his marriage is that it superseded his stint in the Royal Marines. But it’s only the death of his old pal — his mate, as it were — that gets him really crying.

After that, though, he does a lot of manning up. Is it any wonder? The only other woman in Harry’s life, albeit also in a vacant sort of way, is a detective on his tail. And how nobly the ever-charming Emily Mortimer tries to mitigate the lack of characterization with which she’s been saddled here. For her efforts, she gets to wear some nice suits and to seem generally more competent than her fellow officers, who eventually ignite a catastrophic riot in Harry’s housing complex.

But the movie belongs to Caine, who grew up near where Harry Brown was filmed and did military service of his own during the Korean War. Happily, the character-star correspondences end there, as Caine himself has not since been provoked to murderous fascist individualism. Of course, Harry might say that all he wants is just to be able to stroll through that underpass without fear. Ridding the area of repellent degenerates — who, as one broadcaster reports in the film’s last spoken words, have “blighted the lives of the silent majority” — is just a means to an end.

Well, OK. If you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team. You might need them to protect you from this guy.

Is Anybody There?

April 27, 2009

isanybodythere

What a charmer Michael Caine still is. Do we have another 76-year-old actor so able to get away with choosing a movie in part because he recently saw a friend succumb to Alzheimer’s? In this see-saw of poignancy and drollery from writer Peter Harness and director John Crowley, Caine plays a crusty old magician who, while en route to senility, checks into a seaside English village retirement home and reluctantly befriends the death-obsessed young son (Bill Milner) of its harried owners (Anne-Marie Duff and David Morrissey). “You accumulate regrets, and they stick to you like old bruises,” the old man says, with the authority of embittered surrender. In spite of a probably unintended message that mortality is only slightly harder to avoid than cliché, the movie does have its moments. But a more adventurous take would just go ahead and be a Harold and Maude remake, with a cross-dressing Caine in the Ruth Gordon role. 

The Dark Knight

July 15, 2008

darkknight

Just because Batman began again doesn’t mean his life’s been easy. Stealthy though he is, fighting crime after hours while elaborately attired as an insectivorous winged mammal has a way of attracting attention. People want to know who this guy really is. Suspects include Abe Lincoln and Bigfoot, but actually he’s the orphan-cum-billionaire Bruce Wayne, or the actor Christian Bale if you want to get technical.

And yes, in The Dark Knight, Batman’s purposeful, gadget-abetted, vaguely libertarian vigilantism has shown results, but still he’s got his work cut out. Gotham City keeps going to the dogs–and to the copycats, or copybats, or whatever, who want to get in on his act. Now it’s not just the ever-bolder criminal syndicates he has to contend with, but a ragtag amateur army of dork knights, too.

“Why don’t you hire them and take the week off?” his butler Alfred (Michael Caine) sagely suggests. Yet the young master doesn’t budge. It’s official: He’s been fully reclaimed by filmmaker Christopher Nolan as the most earnest of comic-book superheroes (even the fumingly humorless Hulk has nothing on this guy), and now he’s just asking for some joker to come along and ask, “Why so serious?”

That would be the late Heath Ledger as the Joker, and as agile, as balls-to-the-wall and, for lack of a better term, as batshit crazy as everyone has said and hoped he’d be. In the same way Jack Nicholson’s turn in the role for director Tim Burton in 1989 so immediately made clear a once-great actor’s decline into fatness and complacency, Ledger’s haunts with the expected reminder of how rotten it is that the movies have lost him. With help from an unnerving soundtrack, Ledger’s Joker tingles spines with reckless abandon, making a strong argument that losing one’s mind doesn’t at all preclude a career as a criminal mastermind.

So it’s no wonder the otherwise highly capable police lieutenant Gordon (Gary Oldman) decides to call for Bat backup. That’s right: Christian Bale, Heath Ledger and Gary Oldman. Nolan has achieved a grand trifecta of actorly intensity.

He’s also got Morgan Freeman again as Lucius Fox, supplying the gadgets and gravely monitoring their ethical implications; and has upgraded Bruce Wayne’s love interest, Rachel Dawes, from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal, who’s not entirely persuasive as an assistant district attorney but certainly is alluring. Her new lover and boss (Aaron Eckhart) is the brave, upstanding prosecutor Harvey Dent, to whom Bruce hopes to hand over the city-savior gig. “Gotham needs a hero with a face,” he says. There’s some grim foreshadowing there, but see for yourself.

The Dark Knight is a movie that speaks to the exhausted, chaotic fears of our age. In fact, it won’t shut up about them. Our age may be over by the time this movie is done speaking. Like some comic books, it really wants to explain its view of the world–what sort of hero its fictional city deserves, and needs, and has. The script, written by Nolan with his brother Jonathan, is polished and occasionally pleased with itself and overlong. But it offers much: a terrific opening sequence, many thrills, some surprises and a few remarkable transformations of character. 

By movie’s end, it’s safe to say Batman’s life has gotten even harder, and so has waiting for the next sequel.

Children of Men

January 4, 2007

So, welcome to 2007. We’ve now got two years left until humanity loses the ability to make babies. In 20, it’ll be bedlam—literally, a London madhouse, as Children of Men has it, in which the compulsory sorrow of species-wide infertility has brought out the worst in us: war, fascism, terrorism, xenophobia, ruinous environmental negligence, and a thinly-veiled John Lennon impression from Michael Caine.

Actually, under the circumstances, that last item is a highlight. “The world has collapsed,” one public-service announcement says. “Only Britain soldiers on.” This means brutal, but only barely effective, martial law. Grim-visaged urbanites trudge daily to dull jobs through trash-strewn streets under sallow skies, clutching lattes and looking past cages full of non-native refugees on the sidewalks. In this bleakly plausible situation, the quirky Caine shines brightly, as a forest-dwelling dope grower and retired political cartoonist who offers warmth, hippie wisdom, useful connections and a (briefly) safe haven to the movie’s dark-horse protagonist, a well-cast Clive Owen.

Owen plays Theo, a formerly radical activist who’s been ground down into a desk-jockey for the Ministry of Energy. His ex (Julianne Moore) remains a dissident, still battling for immigrants’ rights—which would seem like a ludicrously lost cause except that she’s discovered one (Claire-Hope Ashitey) who happens to be pregnant. Theo is forcibly recruited to obtain the young woman’s exit visa, and then harshly obliged to assist her exit. So, yes, it’s basically V for Vendetta for grownups. Logan’s Run with post-9/11 sensibilities. Blade Runner for—yeah, OK, you get it: dystopia du jour.

But if this Britain is the best thing left in a collapsed world, what could possibly be worth leaving it for? There are rumors of a mysterious offshore concern called the Human Project, which hasn’t taken the barrenness pandemic lying down. The more pressing question is whether Theo’s up to his task. Coyly, perhaps, the film begins with a nice anti-sentimentalist touch: Theo learns from a crowded café television that the youngest person alive—a lifelong celebrity on account of being last to arrive in the world—has just been murdered. With shrugging disdain (“I mean, come on,” he’ll later say, “the guy was a wanker.”), Theo excuses himself, stepping outside just in time to see his café blown to smithereens from an explosion within.

The movie does well by the counterintuitive idea that the best way to convey the horror of a gradually unraveling apocalypse is through an urgent thrust of forward momentum. That conceit of mass sterility is a particularly excruciating prognosis, allowing only enough time to register how bad the news actually is: Don’t relax, it’s later than you think.

No one knows how it happened, by the way, but there’s the sense that we probably deserved it. Nor can anyone supply a (non-Christian) explanation for the refugee’s miracle pregnancy. Director Alfonso Cuarón doesn’t want to bog down in exposition, and given the hectoring, tin-eared tone of occasional attempts at back story, his restraint seems prudent: “As the sounds of the playgrounds faded, the despair set in,” someone intones at one point, leaving the audience to wonder why this project required five writers. Six if you count P.D. James, whose 1992 novel it loosely adapts.

Anyway, the real chops are in the direction. Cuarón delights in marshaling his showpieces, like the finer details of Jim Clay and Geoffrey Kirkland’s just-futuristic-enough production design, or, especially, camera operator George Richmond’s agile enactment of Emmanuel Lubezki’s moody cinematography. A few important sequences transpire in dazzling single takes—so dazzling, actually, that they threaten to show up the action staged within them. The charitable view holds that Cuarón, who also brought us Y tu mamá también and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, is too shrewd to lose sight of human interest, and his indulgent technique only underscores a message about this destabilizing, dehumanizing environment. But that doesn’t fully wash; at least one of those lengthy, hyper-choreographed shots, in which a spatter of blood hits the lens and stays there for a while, seems more interested in aping your average first-person-shooter video game.

Cuarón also shares with his fellow Mexican filmmaker Alejandro González Iñárritu (Babel) a certain bullying impulse, probably forged from culturally sanctioned disenfranchisement, to bring new meaning to the phrase “border conflict” and become a big player of world cinema. That can be self-defeating. Even Harry Potter knows that conspicuous wizardry in matters of social service can read as schadenfreude. Indeed, a world without children is gravely without innocence.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.