Each of director Michael Winterbottom’s films seems exhilaratingly or maddeningly like a departure from the last. His new mockumentary, a BBC TV series here condensed into a movie, follows a friendly but antagonistic pair of self-centered comedians on a week-long road trip through England’s Lake District. Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon play pitiless exaggerations of themselves, touring tony restaurants so Coogan can write a Sunday newspaper article. Really it’s so he and Brydon can bore and annoy and enjoy each other, riffing up a willfully meandering comedic jam session whose highlight has to be the dueling Michael Caine impressions. Other impressions vary, as impressions do (accent-wise, Brydon’s Woody Allen seems much more on target than his Al Pacino, weirdly), and the general question of just where the tedious-hilarious threshold lies will be a rich vein of post-viewing debate, but all parties probably will agree it does get crossed.
Posts Tagged ‘Michael Caine’
The Trip
July 15, 2011Is Anybody There?
April 27, 2009
What a charmer Michael Caine still is. Do we have another 76-year-old actor so able to get away with choosing a movie in part because he recently saw a friend succumb to Alzheimer’s? In this see-saw of poignancy and drollery from writer Peter Harness and director John Crowley, Caine plays a crusty old magician who, while en route to senility, checks into a seaside English village retirement home and reluctantly befriends the death-obsessed young son (Bill Milner) of its harried owners (Anne-Marie Duff and David Morrissey). “You accumulate regrets, and they stick to you like old bruises,” the old man says, with the authority of embittered surrender. In spite of a probably unintended message that mortality is only slightly harder to avoid than cliché, the movie does have its moments. But a more adventurous take would just go ahead and be a Harold and Maude remake, with a cross-dressing Caine in the Ruth Gordon role.
The Dark Knight
July 15, 2008Just because Batman began again doesn’t mean his life’s been easy. Stealthy though he is, fighting crime after hours while elaborately attired as an insectivorous winged mammal has a way of attracting attention. People want to know who this guy really is. Suspects include Abe Lincoln and Bigfoot, but actually he’s the orphan-cum-billionaire Bruce Wayne, or the actor Christian Bale if you want to get technical.
And yes, in The Dark Knight, Batman’s purposeful, gadget-abetted, vaguely libertarian vigilantism has shown results, but still he’s got his work cut out. Gotham City keeps going to the dogs–and to the copycats, or copybats, or whatever, who want to get in on his act. Now it’s not just the ever-bolder criminal syndicates he has to contend with, but a ragtag amateur army of dork knights, too.
“Why don’t you hire them and take the week off?” his butler Alfred (Michael Caine) sagely suggests. Yet the young master doesn’t budge. It’s official: He’s been fully reclaimed by filmmaker Christopher Nolan as the most earnest of comic-book superheroes (even the fumingly humorless Hulk has nothing on this guy), and now he’s just asking for some joker to come along and ask, “Why so serious?”
That would be the late Heath Ledger as the Joker, and as agile, as balls-to-the-wall and, for lack of a better term, as batshit crazy as everyone has said and hoped he’d be. In the same way Jack Nicholson’s turn in the role for director Tim Burton in 1989 so immediately made clear a once-great actor’s decline into fatness and complacency, Ledger’s haunts with the expected reminder of how rotten it is that the movies have lost him. With help from an unnerving soundtrack, Ledger’s Joker tingles spines with reckless abandon, making a strong argument that losing one’s mind doesn’t at all preclude a career as a criminal mastermind.
So it’s no wonder the otherwise highly capable police lieutenant Gordon (Gary Oldman) decides to call for Bat backup. That’s right: Christian Bale, Heath Ledger and Gary Oldman. Nolan has achieved a grand trifecta of actorly intensity.
He’s also got Morgan Freeman again as Lucius Fox, supplying the gadgets and gravely monitoring their ethical implications; and has upgraded Bruce Wayne’s love interest, Rachel Dawes, from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal, who’s not entirely persuasive as an assistant district attorney but certainly is alluring. Her new lover and boss (Aaron Eckhart) is the brave, upstanding prosecutor Harvey Dent, to whom Bruce hopes to hand over the city-savior gig. “Gotham needs a hero with a face,” he says. There’s some grim foreshadowing there, but see for yourself.
The Dark Knight is a movie that speaks to the exhausted, chaotic fears of our age. In fact, it won’t shut up about them. Our age may be over by the time this movie is done speaking. Like some comic books, it really wants to explain its view of the world–what sort of hero its fictional city deserves, and needs, and has. The script, written by Nolan with his brother Jonathan, is polished and occasionally pleased with itself and overlong. But it offers much: a terrific opening sequence, many thrills, some surprises and a few remarkable transformations of character.
By movie’s end, it’s safe to say Batman’s life has gotten even harder, and so has waiting for the next sequel.
Children of Men
January 4, 2007So, welcome to 2007. We’ve now got two years left until humanity loses the ability to make babies. In 20, it’ll be bedlam—literally, a London madhouse, as Children of Men has it, in which the compulsory sorrow of species-wide infertility has brought out the worst in us: war, fascism, terrorism, xenophobia, ruinous environmental negligence, and a thinly-veiled John Lennon impression from Michael Caine.
Actually, under the circumstances, that last item is a highlight. “The world has collapsed,” one public-service announcement says. “Only Britain soldiers on.” This means brutal, but only barely effective, martial law. Grim-visaged urbanites trudge daily to dull jobs through trash-strewn streets under sallow skies, clutching lattes and looking past cages full of non-native refugees on the sidewalks. In this bleakly plausible situation, the quirky Caine shines brightly, as a forest-dwelling dope grower and retired political cartoonist who offers warmth, hippie wisdom, useful connections and a (briefly) safe haven to the movie’s dark-horse protagonist, a well-cast Clive Owen.
Owen plays Theo, a formerly radical activist who’s been ground down into a desk-jockey for the Ministry of Energy. His ex (Julianne Moore) remains a dissident, still battling for immigrants’ rights—which would seem like a ludicrously lost cause except that she’s discovered one (Claire-Hope Ashitey) who happens to be pregnant. Theo is forcibly recruited to obtain the young woman’s exit visa, and then harshly obliged to assist her exit. So, yes, it’s basically V for Vendetta for grownups. Logan’s Run with post-9/11 sensibilities. Blade Runner for—yeah, OK, you get it: dystopia du jour.
But if this Britain is the best thing left in a collapsed world, what could possibly be worth leaving it for? There are rumors of a mysterious offshore concern called the Human Project, which hasn’t taken the barrenness pandemic lying down. The more pressing question is whether Theo’s up to his task. Coyly, perhaps, the film begins with a nice anti-sentimentalist touch: Theo learns from a crowded café television that the youngest person alive—a lifelong celebrity on account of being last to arrive in the world—has just been murdered. With shrugging disdain (“I mean, come on,” he’ll later say, “the guy was a wanker.”), Theo excuses himself, stepping outside just in time to see his café blown to smithereens from an explosion within.
The movie does well by the counterintuitive idea that the best way to convey the horror of a gradually unraveling apocalypse is through an urgent thrust of forward momentum. That conceit of mass sterility is a particularly excruciating prognosis, allowing only enough time to register how bad the news actually is: Don’t relax, it’s later than you think.
No one knows how it happened, by the way, but there’s the sense that we probably deserved it. Nor can anyone supply a (non-Christian) explanation for the refugee’s miracle pregnancy. Director Alfonso Cuarón doesn’t want to bog down in exposition, and given the hectoring, tin-eared tone of occasional attempts at back story, his restraint seems prudent: “As the sounds of the playgrounds faded, the despair set in,” someone intones at one point, leaving the audience to wonder why this project required five writers. Six if you count P.D. James, whose 1992 novel it loosely adapts.
Anyway, the real chops are in the direction. Cuarón delights in marshaling his showpieces, like the finer details of Jim Clay and Geoffrey Kirkland’s just-futuristic-enough production design, or, especially, camera operator George Richmond’s agile enactment of Emmanuel Lubezki’s moody cinematography. A few important sequences transpire in dazzling single takes—so dazzling, actually, that they threaten to show up the action staged within them. The charitable view holds that Cuarón, who also brought us Y tu mamá también and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, is too shrewd to lose sight of human interest, and his indulgent technique only underscores a message about this destabilizing, dehumanizing environment. But that doesn’t fully wash; at least one of those lengthy, hyper-choreographed shots, in which a spatter of blood hits the lens and stays there for a while, seems more interested in aping your average first-person-shooter video game.
Cuarón also shares with his fellow Mexican filmmaker Alejandro González Iñárritu (Babel) a certain bullying impulse, probably forged from culturally sanctioned disenfranchisement, to bring new meaning to the phrase “border conflict” and become a big player of world cinema. That can be self-defeating. Even Harry Potter knows that conspicuous wizardry in matters of social service can read as schadenfreude. Indeed, a world without children is gravely without innocence.



