Posts Tagged ‘Jon Favreau’

Cowboys & Aliens

July 28, 2011

Once in a while, even the most tried and true narrative formula needs repackaging for retail-friendliness. Or so it must seem at least to those bottom-line minders who cut checks to Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford.

So let’s do this: a thing and another thing…but not the other thing you expect! And the thing is cool, and the other thing is differently cool, so as to convey a vibe of maybe just being plum crazy enough to work. This being a delicate art, it’ll involve some trial and error. Like so.

Spaghetti and meatballs: Classic.

Spaghetti and glass shards: No thank you!

Spaghetti and Gummi Bears: Keep talking….

And before we know it we’re in the Old West, but with invading extraterrestrials. “Cowboys & Aliens” may sound conceptually obvious, but in fact it is obvious in every other way, too. For instance, Craig and Ford don’t play the aliens. And if this is not exactly what you expect from director Jon Favreau and an original movie-ready property by comic book industrialist Scott Mitchell Rosenberg, it must be because you’re not sure who those guys are anyway. No matter.

The stars look great, but unfortunately that’s no matter either. If anything could redeem this, it would be the sense of a kid gathering all his random toys together, non sequiturs be damned, into one sincerely urgent, internally logical superstory. What “Cowboys & Aliens” lacks, aside from the better execution we’ve already seen more than once in Pixar’s “Toy Story” franchise (not to mention Ford’s own frolic with Gene Wilder in “The Frisco Kid” some 30-odd years ago), is an attitude of abandon.

All the cheerfully winking genre enthusiasm Favreau brought to such fun romps as “Elf” and the first “Iron Man” is not readily apparent here. “Cowboys & Aliens” feels like a perfunctory, mercantile exercise — sagging misshapenly under the weight of its way too many producer and writer credits, which include some big shots whose demands may well have simply worn Favreau down.

Neither homage nor satire, quite, it’s more like a brainstormed shorthand checklist of plot points and payoffs. The characters got sketched in at some juncture, and since then everyone seems to have just decided to leave them sketchy, letting stereotype pose as archetype. There’s the loner hero (Craig) with no past, and no fear. The crusty rival-cum-ally (Ford) with a heart of gold. The irksome whelp (Paul Dano) on whom the hero puts a beating, to comic effect. There’s the hero surrounded: by thugs, by Apache, by aliens, and the surprise cavalry-arrival rescue(s) just when all seems lost. There’s the creature all up in your business, with body parts within its body parts. The uncertain but timely weapons proficiency. The boy and his dog. The manly speech. The humbling. The vision quest. The warrior honor bullshit. The woman (Abigail Spencer) who gets to make out with Daniel Craig. The other woman (Olivia Wilde) who gets to make out with Daniel Craig. There’s the blah blah and uh huh and whatever.

Some scenes begin promisingly but most just tend to stall out. We’re invited to do the dramatic (or occasionally comedic) legwork ourselves, but not at all required to, so it’s doubly insulting. If you’re sick of cowboy cliches, Favreau seems to be saying, just wait for the space-invader cliches. If you’re sick of those, it’ll be over soon.

Sam Rockwell brings some less contrived humanity to his tagalong supporting part as a docile shopkeeper, and the movie seems happy to have him, so that’s nice. But of course it’s a movie whose principal achievement probably is the stoic array of straight faces it has managed to gather under its own silly circumstances. Just about everyone who appears here does seem wholly convinced that he or she populates and Old West being invaded by extraterrestrials. There is some squinting, what with the scorching southwestern sun and the interstellar trespassers’ probing beams, but winking at the audience? Next to none.

That leaves us and the bottom-line minders standing glumly in a pile of packaging. “Cowboys & Aliens” really is just a hooky premise in search of a paycheck. Don’t let it abduct yours.

Iron Man 2

May 7, 2010

By way of preamble, it does its requisite bit of forging and soldering and banging out a setup, but only at the fittingly named Stark Expo do proper Iron Man 2 introductions begin. Exposition might be the only order of this movie’s business: With all the fireworks, the gadgetry, the corporatized idol worship and heavy-duty charm, it finally amounts to a Marvel Studios trade show.

Thank goodness it’s still got Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark, the rocket-powered knight in self-styled armor, to guide us through the conspicuous outlay. As expected, he’s in a chatty, romping mood, and about as lovable as an alcoholic billionaire narcissist can be.

But even after the great flamboyant relief of coming out as Iron Man, Stark still has his issues. For one thing, he’s got a problem with his gear: It keeps him alive, but it’s killing him, and not metaphorically. Subbing in sludgy chlorophyll smoothies for his much-preferred cocktails isn’t quite enough. There is the small matter of needing to invent a new element.

Also, Stark’s quest to keep his deadly technology out of the wrong hands has become more complicated. His antagonists are many. They include Garry Shandling as a grasping Senate subcommittee chairman; Don Cheadle (formerly Terrence Howard) as a suddenly adversarial friend and military ally; John Slattery, seen in yellowing corporate-propaganda filmstrips, as Stark’s dead weapon-maker dad; and of course Downey’s fellow near-casualty of 1980s Hollywood, Mickey Rourke, as a seething Siberian exile with an axe to grind and a pair of live-wire whips to crack.

That Rourke’s character’s patchwork of prison tats seems more authentic than his advanced understanding of physics is part of the copious superhero-comic charm — an endowment which also must account for Scarlett Johansson as that new girl, the buxom and mysterious martial artist from the Stark Industries legal department.

We know what this means. At the very least, it means increased personal and professional responsibility for Stark’s put-upon assistant Pepper Potts, played once more with aplomb by Gwyneth Paltrow.

But wait, there’s more: Enter Sam Rockwell as Tony’s squirrelly arms-dealer rival Justin Hammer, a sort of Stark lite; and Sam Jackson as Nick Fury, the head of a covert agency called SHIELD. Marvel Comics completists will observe that hammers and shields are of special importance here, at least as far as franchise propagation is concerned.

We can say that director Jon Favreau is concerned about franchise propagation. With its wily script by Justin Theroux, Favreau’s film is hearty and swiftly paced, but not helped by having so many characters in need of establishment and so few actors on par with Downey’s rapturous timing. Everybody seems happy to be here, yes, but the net effect is of a generously borne mutual strain.

And it’s too bad those menacing, most promising moments — Stark suited up and falling-down drunk at his own birthday party, Hammer’s machines running murderously amok — go without the more thoughtful attention they deserve. Favreau and co. do have a knack for meeting superhero blockbuster expectations. But what else have they got? Guess we’ll just have to wait for next year’s Stark Expo to find out.

 

Couples Retreat

October 7, 2009

couplesretreat-1024x682

Early on in “Couples Retreat,” Vince Vaughn’s character finds himself in a housewares store, where his young son has used a toilet meant only for display. “There’s not a lot to say,” Vaughn forthrightly tells a galled clerk, by way of apology. That’s pretty much what it’s like to review “Couples Retreat.” When confronted with an exasperating, almost cute, innocently impolite public excretion, the strong temptation is just to let the act speak for itself and quickly withdraw.

But that might seem lazy, so here’s more.

After a brisk couples-through-the-ages montage and many long and leaden minutes of setup (not a lot to say, apparently, but much to do), four couples come to a tropical resort, where their collective vacation briskly becomes many long and leaden minutes of marriage-repair therapy. One of the couples–it doesn’t matter which–has been on the verge of divorce, and the only recourse was to drag the others along for some “skill-building” on the beach at the more affordable group rate. Well, you get what you pay for.

This may sound like the pretext for a torture-porn horror thriller, and certain audiences inevitably will see it as such. What it’s supposed to be is a romantic comedy of classical appeal. What it is, really, is more like a half-assed update of “Fantasy Island,” somehow both shriveled to short-sitcom proportions and bloated to feature-film length.

The director is Peter Billingsley. (I went into this hoping not to mention “A Christmas Story” at all, as a way of allowing Billingsley’s adulthood and multidisciplinary career the benefit of the doubt. Now it seems the best way to do that might be to not mention “Couples Retreat” at all. But I’m committed.) The stars are Vaughn and Jon Favreau (who wrote the script together, with Dana Fox), Jason Bateman, Faizon Love, Kristin Davis, Malin Akerman, Kristen Bell and Kali Hawk. They’re all perfectly easy to like (although a nagging voice in the back of the head may ask whether Bateman’s recent big-screen ubiquity finally has overstayed its welcome), and just as easy to forget. That also goes for Peter Serafinowicz as their punctilious host, Jean Reno as their “Couples Whisperer” guru, and Carlos Ponce as a buff, inappropriate yoga instructor. Among the plot points, in addition to some boilerplate romantic recriminations, are a shark attack, a Guitar Hero showdown and a general sense of Vaughn and Favreau coming to terms with not being in “Swingers” anymore.

Even still, “Couples Retreat” sometimes gives off an air of self-satisfaction. It’s a mild air, like a warm island breeze, and seems to be the natural result of good pals having a good time in a good place making a movie that’s just not good.

Vaughn in particular lately has seemed increasingly at ease with squandering his gifts. His way of not being bothered by mediocrity almost is charming in and of itself. Which is not to say it should be rewarded. Real couples in need of retreat from busy but average lives will recognize themselves in his character’s avowal, during that protracted prologue, to “buckle down over these next six months, and then when we come up for air, we’ll go somewhere.” Indeed, getting away from it all isn’t easy. Start by getting away from this movie.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.